.Google.com's Martin Splitt answered an inquiry in the SEO Workplace Hrs podcast about whether replicating YouTube video clip content right into text on a web page would be viewed as reproduce material and also have an unfavorable impact on the website page positions.Although replicate information is certainly not a damaging ranking variable, web content released on a more reliable website can easily create the web content on the a lot less authoritative site to be outed perform. It's a valid question to inquire due to the fact that information on an authoritative will definitely out perform the very same web content on a less authoritative one.Some in the search community describe one part of material usurping the ranks of another as 'cannibalization' of the webpage's ranking possibility. This is actually the concern of the individual asking the inquiry.Google.com's Martin Splitt told the submitted question:." If I create a YouTube video clip and after that take that particular text or web content as well as spot it on a web page, could Google.com flag that web page or even internet site for duplicate content?".Various Web Content Media Are Actually Addressed As Separate.Martin Splitt answered that both forms of content are actually various and will certainly not be managed as the same content, thereby publishing text message content drawn out from a video clip will definitely certainly not be considered replicate information.This is his solution:." Zero, one is a video recording and the other one is text message information, which would certainly be actually one-of-a-kind information!".Publishing Drew Out Text From Video Recording.Martin commended the suggestion of drawing out text message information from a video recording and also republishing it as text, noting that some people choose to eat content in content type rather than enjoying a video clip. Switching the flow of information from content to audio or video is probably certainly not a negative idea also due to the fact that some folks have problem reading through text information and might favor listening to it coming from a video or a podcast format.Martin talked about printing video recording web content in a textual variation:." It is actually also not a bad tip, some individuals (like me) could choose a text variation and also others might certainly not have the capacity to use a video variation of the web content in the first place due to data transfer or visual restraints.".Takeaways.The suggestion responsible for the inquiry is actually repurposing web content as well as it's a really good idea. Browse is much more than Google, it is actually likewise YouTube and wherever people acquire their audio information, like Spotify. The reality that there is actually no cannibalization of the information in between channels helps make repurposing a viable approach to extending your content range.Pay attention to the podcast at the 8:20 moment mark:.Featured Graphic by Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi.